|
1
|
- Tom Gillaspy, State Demographer
- Mn Dept of Administration
- April 27, 2005
|
|
2
|
- Minnesota is a prosperous and growing state
- Aging will challenge growth and prosperity and change our government
priorities
- Aging will combine with growth, suburbanization, and increased diversity
to dramatically change Minnesota
|
|
3
|
- It is not normal for a society to age
- Dramatic changes will be seen in 2008 and 2011 and beyond
- By 2020, the number of Minnesotans 65+ will increase by 53%. By 2030 it will double
- Aging, combined with three other trends lead to challenges and
opportunities not fully anticipated
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Minnesota adds about half a million people per decade—713,000 by 2020
- Census Bureau has us growing faster than any other Midwest and northeast
state
- Census Bureau projections have us maintaining our 8 congressional seats
- And growth is age related—people who move long distances are younger
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- The Minnesota portion of the Twin Cities is accounting for 78% of growth
in the state
- The suburban ring is growing rapidly and spreading outward
- Many rural counties and Minneapolis and St. Paul are smaller than they
were in 1950
- Population growth is related to economic growth—huge differences exist
in life experiences and prosperity across the state
- And this is age related—suburbs are younger/prairie is much older
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Minnesota is one of the least diverse states in the nation—13% minority
v US 32%
- Over half of total population growth this decade is minority.
- Growing disparity in education and health outcomes
- And this is related to age—new, diverse population is younger
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Labor force will age and grow more slowly
- Productivity levels must increase to grow
- Incomes will grow more slowly with retirements
- Consumption patterns (what we buy) will change
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Income growth will slow
- Sources of income will shift to those with lower tax rates
- What we will buy (sales taxes) will change
- Older electorate will vote more conservatively on tax issues
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Sharply increasing costs will crowd out other expenditures
- Obesity has long run implications
- Disparities in health access and outcome—rural/urban, race/ethnicity
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- K-12 enrollments are declining slowly
- Students of color are increasing
- Higher education enrollments rising but will soon peak
- Achievement levels of students of color are a major issue
- Our ability to compete in the world economy will depend on the quality
of our workforce, not its quantity
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- Issue of water—quantity and quality.
Many high growth areas of the nation are seriously short of water
- Large disparities and incomes and growth among different areas of the
state
- Importance of labor force and productivity in future economic growth
|
|
22
|
- Building for growth—adding half a million people per decade
- Location—difficult to move from decline to growth areas
- Are we building enough to account for growth and redistribution of
population?
|
|
23
|
- Government workforce is aging and retirements will accelerate by 2008
- Opportunity for workforce planning to move government forward
- Governance—some boundaries haven’t changed in a long time
|
|
24
|
|